Image: Murray-Darling Conservation Alliance
Central to restoring health to Australia’s most significant river system, the Murray-Darling Basin Plan is experiencing a critical decade-long review, with a call for bold and significant changes. This review aims to evaluate and improve the strategies required to bring the river system back to life, which has been a subject of increasing concern amid recent environmental crises, including another mass fish kill episode in the lower Darling due to extreme heat.
The Murray-Darling Conservation Alliance sees the review as a crucial step in addressing challenges and how they manage this critically important river system. “The rivers, wetlands and floodplains of the Murray-Darling Basin are in trouble,” said Craig Wilkins, Murray-Darling Conservation Alliance Co-Director. “Too much water is still being taken from rivers for irrigation, not enough water is reaching wetlands and floodplains, and climate change is adding to these pressures. The recent listing of the lower River Murray as Critically Endangered demonstrates how serious the situation is.”
Public consultation processes began alongside the release of the Review Discussion Paper, setting the stage for potentially significant policy shifts. Craig shared, “Ten years ago, the Basin Plan set out to return the Murray-Darling system to health. The Australian public has invested over $11 billion in implementing the Plan. This review of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan is a welcome opportunity to look at what’s working and what needs to change.”
There’s a unified call from environmental leaders for the review not to shy away from making drastic, vital changes. Jacqui Mumford, CEO of Nature Conservation Council NSW, said, “The science is unequivocal. The official recognition of the Macquarie Marshes as endangered confirms what we have known for years: the current extraction limits are not sustainable. They were a political compromise that has failed to protect our most precious wetlands.”
Similarly, Jono La Nauze, CEO of Environment Victoria, said, “The Basin Plan review gives the Albanese government a choice between leaving a legacy of decline or a legacy of restoration. Future generations need a truly ambitious plan that returns health and resilience to the Murray-Darling Basin. This is the moment to get it right.”
Despite clear recognition of the threats from climate change outlined in the discussion paper, there is strong criticism regarding the proposal to defer addressing climate change impacts until 2036. Craig shared, “This ‘head in the sand’ approach is not in the best interest of communities or river health and fails to adequately manage climate risks. The water extraction limits need to be reevaluated in the context of climate change, which we know will mean a hotter and drier Basin with less water flowing into rivers.
“The paper acknowledges that ‘climate change poses major risks to the Basin’s communities, industries and environments’ and ‘will make it more difficult to maintain wetlands, floodplains and river ecosystems’. Yet the discussion paper proposes not to change water extraction limits in response. This appears to be a concerning failure to mitigate climate risks.”
As the review progresses, the Alliance and various environmental bodies are set to advocate vigorously for the environmental necessities of the rivers, urging a shift from political compromise to ecologically sound decision-making that aligns with contemporary scientific understanding and future projections.
As the basin plan undergoes scrutiny and potential transformation, the alliance between government bodies and environmental groups will be crucial in pivoting towards a sustainable and ecologically prosperous future for the Murray-Darling Basin.
For more information, click here.
More News
